Galleria Borghese logo
Search results for
No results :(

Hints for your search:

  • Search engine results update instantly as soon as you change your search key.
  • If you have entered more than one word, try to simplify the search by writing only one, later you can add other words to filter the results.
  • Omit words with less than 3 characters, as well as common words like "the", "of", "from", as they will not be included in the search.
  • You don't need to enter accents or capitalization.
  • The search for words, even if partially written, will also include the different variants existing in the database.
  • If your search yields no results, try typing just the first few characters of a word to see if it exists in the database.

Resting Satyr

Roman art

The statue depicts a young satyr at rest, leaning against a tree trunk in an elegant and languid pose. The body, partially covered by panther pelt, presents a sinuous rhythm, and the face, reclining towards the viewer’s right, shows a serene and content expression. The prototype is generally recognised as a mature work by the Greek sculptor Praxiteles, which was particularly appreciated in the Roman age – as its 114 known replicas testify – and which was especially used in atriums, gardens and interior ceremonial spaces in both public and private contexts. This statue was moved to the villa outside Porta Pinciana in 1828, when it was entrusted to Antonio d’Este for restoration, before being displayed in Room VIII. It can perhaps be identified with the Ceoli Satyr purchased by Cardinal Scipione Borghese in 1607 and placed in the wall of the inner garden of the Borghese city palazzo, where it is depicted in an engraving by Venturini from the second half of the seventeenth century.

Object details

prima metà II sec.d.C.
white marble
height without plinth cm 174 (head cm 27)

Ceoli Collection; Borghese Collection, from 1607 (cited in the Inventario della primogenitura di Giovanni Battista Borghese, 1610, no. 8); Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese, 1833, C, p. 54, no. 186. Purchased by the Italian State, 1902.

Conservation and Diagnostic
  • 1828, Antonio D’Este
  • 1996-97, Liana Persichelli


The statue depicts a young satyr – recognisable by his feral ears and the pardalide – elegantly and languidly standing in a resting pose: the left leg, in tension, supports the body leaning against the tree trunk while the right is slightly bent. In the restored right hand there was once an object, perhaps a single or double flute. The body is only partially covered by the panther pelt, draped from the right shoulder across to the left hip; the panther snout hangs from the right shoulder, covering the armpit. The compositional structure, built according to a sinuous rhythm, traces an ‘S’ along the median of the body terminating at the top with the head reclining towards the observer’s right. The face shows a serene and content expression, while the gaze seems to be directed towards a frontal viewer; the hair is gathered into thick locks held back by a tainia.

The statue was only moved to the villa outside Porta Pinciana in 1828, when it was entrusted to Antonio d’Este for restoration before being placed in Room VIII, on the occasion of the setting up of the new collection in the Casino, impoverished by the massive sale of works to Napoleon Bonaparte. According to Paolo Moreno, the statue can be identified with the Satyr in a drawing by Andrea Boscoli at Palazzo Ceoli in Via Giulia, purchased by Cardinal Scipione Borghese together with other works in 1607 (Moreno, Viacava 2003, p. 251). The sculpure, one of the ‘Two Beautiful Fauns Leaning on a Trunk’ mentioned in the inventory of primogeniture (Inventario della primogenitura) of 1610 (De Lachenal 1982, Appendix VI, no. 8), was placed in Palazzo Borghese in Campo Marzio, in one of the eight niches in the wall of the inner garden of the Borghese city palazzo, the so-called Teatro (theatre) where it appears in an engraving by Venturini from the second half of the seventeenth century (Falda 1691, table 11). According to another hypothesis, however, the Ceoli Satyr in Boscoli’s drawing should rather be identified with the one now in the new storage spaces at Museo Pietro Canonica (Campitelli 2001; Napoletano, Santolini 2013, p. 162).

Also known as Satyr Anapauomenos (at rest), J. J. Winckelmann and E. Q. Visconti attributed this sculpture to the Greek sculptor Praxiteles, a hypothesis mostly supported by scholars. Still object of debate, however, is its possible correspondence with one of the satyr statues attributed to the sculptor such as the one in Parian marble that Pausanias (I, 43.5) mentions in the temple of Dionysus at Megara, or with the bronze statue of the periboetos – included by Pliny in the catalogue of the artist’s bronze statues (Naturalis Historia XXXIV, 69) – or, finally, with the one displayed on Tripodon Street in Athens. As for the dating of the prototype, the similarities with the Cnidian Aphrodite in the rhythmic composition of the figure and the torsion of the hips, and the affinities with the cupbearer of Dionysus in three-dimensional aspects lead to its identification as a product of the Greek sculptor’s maturity (Mattei 2010).

The statue is known to us through at least 114 replicas, mainly from Rome and its surroundings, but also spread throughout the provinces of the empire (Pasquier, Martinez 2007). Contributing to the success of the subject in the Roman world was the high adaptability of the iconography to the decoration of atriums and gardens and prestigious interior reception spaces, in both public and private contexts. The main elements that distinguish the replicas are the distance between the tree trunk and the body of the satyr, on which the very balance of the figure depends, the tilting of the head, whether or not it faces downwards, and the presence of a crown of pine cones or a simple tainia on the head. The Villa Borghese statue belongs to the group of Satyrs depicted in a frontal position, with the head inclined and the right shoulder slightly higher than the left, and can be compared to one of the two statues in the Munich Glyptoteca (inv. 228). Some technical and executive characteristics liken the piece to the one in the Capitoline Museums (inv. S 739), whose provenance from Hadrian’s Villa suggests that it may be identified as a classical Hadrian age sculpture, perhaps the product of an urban workshop.

Jessica Clementi

  • G. B. Falda, Le fontane di Roma nelle piazze, e luoghi publici della città, III, Roma 1691, tav. 11.
  • A. Nibby, Monumenti scelti della Villa Borghese, Roma 1832, p. 126, n. 5.
  • Indicazione delle opere antiche di scultura esistenti nel primo piano della Villa Borghese, Roma 1840, p. 24, n. 7.
  • A. Nibby, Roma nell’anno 1838, Roma 1841, p. 924, n. 7.
  • Indicazione delle opere antiche di scultura esistenti nel primo piano della Villa Borghese, Roma 1854 (1873), p. 28, n. 8.
  • A. Venturi, Il Museo e la Galleria Borghese, Roma 1893, p. 48.
  • G. Giusti, La Galerie Borghèse et la Ville Humbert Premier à Rome, Roma 1904, p. 33.
  • E. Rizzo, Prassitele, Milano 1932, p. 34, tavv. 50-54.
  • A. De Rinaldis, La R. Galleria Borghese in Roma, Roma 1935, p. 17.
  • P. Della Pergola, La Galleria Borghese in Roma, Roma 1954, p. 22.
  • R. Calza, Catalogo del Gabinetto fotografico Nazionale, Galleria Borghese, Collezione degli oggetti antichi, Roma 1957, p. 8, n. 24.
  • G. Gercke, Satyrn des Praxiteles, Hamburg 1968, p. 38, n. T20.
  • P. Moreno, Formazione della raccolta di antichità del Museo e Galleria Borghese, in “Colloqui del Sodalizio”, 5, 1975-1976, pp. 125-143, in part. pp. 135-136, figg. 25, 27.
  • P. Moreno, Museo e Galleria Borghese, La collezione archeologica, Roma 1980, p. 20.
  • P. Moreno, S. Staccioli, Le collezioni della Galleria Borghese, Milano 1981, p. 101, fig. a p. 86.
  • L. De Lachenal, La collezione di sculture antiche della famiglia Borghese e il palazzo in Campo Marzio, in “Xenia”, 4, 1982, pp. 49-117, in part. pp. 52, 62, 96, Appendice VI, n.8.
  • D. Di Castro, S. P. Fox (a cura di), Disegni dell’antico dei secoli XVI e XVII dalle collezioni del Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe (Catalogo della mostra), Roma 1983, p. 104, n. 47.
  • P. Moreno, C. Sforzini, I ministri del principe Camillo: cronaca della collezione Borghese di antichità dal 1807 al 1832, in “Scienze dell’Antichità”,1, 1987, pp. 339-371, in part. pp. 342, 360.
  • H. Herdejurgen, Antike und moderne Reliefs in der Villa Borghese, in “Archäologischen Anzeiger”, 4 (1997), pp. 480-503, in part., p. 483.
  • P. Moreno, C. Stefani, Galleria Borghese, Milano 2000, p. 185, n. 1.
  • A. Campitelli, Horti Borghesiani. Sculture da Villa Borghese, in “Bollettino dei Musei Comunali di Roma”, n.s. XV, 2001, pp. 163-181.
  • P. Moreno, A. Viacava, I marmi antichi della Galleria Borghese. La collezione archeologica di Camillo e Francesco Borghese, Roma 2003, pp. 250-251, n. 239.
  • A. Pasquier, J.L. Martinez, Praxitele, catalogo della mostra, Paris 2007, pp. 268-269, n. 20.
  • M. Mattei, Statua d Satiro in riposo, in Musei Capitolini. Le sculture del Palazzo Nuovo, vol. I, a cura di E. La Rocca, C. Paris Presicce, Roma 2010, pp. 446-451, n. 5.
  • A. Napoletano, S. Santolini, Le sculture di Villa Borghese nel nuovo deposito del Museo Pietro Canonica, in “Bollettino dei Musei Comunali di Roma”, n.s. XXVII, 2013, pp. 153-178.
  • Scheda di catalogo 12/01008532, P. Moreno 1976; aggiornamento G. Ciccarello 2021